myCorporateResource.com

Saturday, May 25th

Last update03:14:03 PM

Just in....
  •  
About Guides FAQs

Font Size

Profile

Layout

Direction

Menu Style

Apply Reset  
Cpanel
You are here: Country/Region Australia Corporate & Capital Markets (Australia) Shafron v ASIC: When is a General Counsel an Officer?

Trending ..... 2013-2014 Federal Budget ..... High Court Confirms Validity of International Arbitration Act ..... ACCC on Unfair Contracts ..... Transfer Pricing Reform ..... Google Not Liable for 3rd Party Content ..... Anti-Discrimination Reforms ..... National Credit Reforms ..... Building Code 2013 ..... Rating Agency Liable to CDO Investors ..... Australia in Asian Century ..... ASX's Continuous Disclosure Guidance ..... Queensland Ends Uranium Mining Ban ..... NSW's Proposed Planning System ..... Privacy Bill  ..... New OTC Derivatives Rules ..... Fair Work Act ..... OHS Harmonisation ..... Personal Property Securities Act ..... Carbon Pricing

Shafron v ASIC: When is a General Counsel an Officer?

GilbertTobinlogoPenalties imposed on James Hardie officers – what does this mean for officers?

Gilbert + Tobin
November 15, 2012
4 pages

ashurstlogoJames Hardie: The final chapter

Ashurst
November 14, 2012
3 pages

MinterEllisonLogoJames Hardie, the appeal on penalties

Minter Ellison
November 13, 2012
4 pages

corrslogoThe High Court and James Hardie

Corrs
May 22, 2012
2 pages

corrslogoThe High Court decision in James Hardie and impact for general counsel

Corrs
May 22, 2012
2 pages

ashurstlogoJames Hardie case: Practical lessons for directors, company secretaries and general counsel

Ashurst
May 9, 2012
10 pages

MinterEllisonLogoThe High Court decides the James Hardie case

Minter Ellison
May 9, 2012
10 pages

GilbertTobinlogoHigh Court ruling on James Hardie - some guidance for the accidental officer

Gilbert + Tobin
May 7, 2012
3 pages

DLAPiperLogoDirector's final cut of An Officer and a Gen-eral Counsel: the High Court's decision

DLA Piper
May 7, 2012
2 pages

FreehillsLogoJames Hardie – the High Court’s decision

Freehills
May 4, 2012
2 pages