myCorporateResource.com

Skip to content

You are here: Area of Law

Employee Litigation

Skip to content

Trending ..... Bowman v. Monsanto: SCOTUS on Self-Replicating Technologies (eg Seeds) ..... Broker-Dealer Faces FCPA, Travel Act and Securities Fraud Charges for Venezuelan Payments ..... NLRB's Employee Rights Poster Comes Down ..... Ralph Lauren Settles FCPA Charges ..... Kiobel: SCOTUS Sends Alien Tort Statute Packing ..... DoJ Cuts Corporate Plea Agreement Carve-Out ..... The SEC's Netflix Report: Regulation FD and Social Media ..... Changes to DGCL Would Simplify Back-end Mergers ..... SCOTUS Decides Comcast v Behrend ..... Standard Fire: SCOTUS on CAFA Amount in Controversy Rules ..... Kallick: DE Board Enjoined from Opposing Rival Slate ..... Advisers Falling Short on Custody Rule ..... How Bad Will it Be? That is Sequestration ..... Gabelli v. SEC: SCOTUS on Limitations Period for Federal Enforcement Actions ..... HIPAA Omnibus Rule ..... Final FATCA Regs ..... PPACA: Play or Pay ..... DOJ/SEC Issue FCPA Guidance .....

Employee Litigation News

Jackson Lewis: Guards’ Class Action for Meal and Rest Periods, Unpaid Overtime to Proceed, California Court Rules in Post-Brinker Decision

May 23, 2013 Human Resources-Litigation

Proskauer: Mihalik v. Credit Agricole Cheuvreux: Second Circuit Clarifies Standard of Review of New York City Human Rights Law Claims

May 22, 2013 Human Resources-Litigation

Seyfarth Shaw: Court of Appeal: A Common Unlawful Policy May Be Sufficient For Class Certification [Faulkinbury v. Boyd & Associates, Inc]

May 22, 2013 Human Resources-Litigation

Kasten v. Saint-Gobain: Oral Complaints Are Protected Activity Under The FLSA

Bass Berry Sims: Two Supreme Court Decisions Potentially Expand Employer Liability

Paul Hastings: United States Supreme Court Expands Retaliation Risks for Employers

Venable: Complaint or Not Complaint: That is the Question

Staub v Proctor Hospital: Supreme Court Expands "Cat's Paw" Liability in Employment Discrimination Case

Proskauer: The Take-Aways from the Supreme Court’s “Cat’s Paw” Decision

Pillsbury: Supreme Court Reinforces Obligation of Decision-Maker to Carefully Examine the Basis for Taking Employment Action

Akerman: Employers Beware of the "Cat's Paw:" Discriminatory Animus Within the Chain of Command

Collins v. Gee West Seattle: Ninth Circuit Holds WARN Act "Employment Losses" Include Pre-Closure Leavers

Seyfarth Shaw: Employees Who Quit In Anticipation Of Business Closure Count As “Employment Losses” Under The WARN Act

Morgan Lewis: Confusion Over “Voluntary” Departures When Evaluating WARN Notice Requirements: Employers Beware

Holland & Knight: Ninth Circuit Creates New Bright Line Rule: Employees Who Abandon Their Jobs Because of a Business Closing Have Not Voluntarily Departed per WARN

NASA v Nelson & Federal Background Checks

Baker Donelson: Two Recent Supreme Court Holdings Split The Difference For Employees/Employers

Mintz Levin: Privacy Implications of Employment Background Checks: U.S. Supreme Court Rules for Employers

Littler: U.S. Supreme Court Holds that Constitutional Privacy Rights Do Not Restrict the Government's Discretion to Background Check Federal Contractors

Thompson v. NA Stainless & 3rd Party Protection Under Title VII’s Anti-Retaliation Provisions

Latham & Watkins: Supreme Court Limits Reach of Non-Article III Courts’ Jurisdiction

Faegre & Benson: Supreme Court Decides J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro

Schulte Roth & Zabel: Supreme Court Expands Availability of Retaliation Claim to Parties “Connected” to an Employee Who Complains of Discrimination

Dukes v Wal-Mart: Certification of Title VII Discrimination Class Action

Paul Hastings: The Untolled Tale: American Pipe Tolling in the Wake of Dukes v. Wal-Mart

Littler: Dukes v. Wal-Mart: Some Closed Doors and Open Issues

Nixon Peabody: Dukes redux: plaintiffs seek certification of smaller class sizes in two states