myCorporateResource.com

Skip to content

You are here: Area of Law

Employee Litigation

Proskauer: Third Circuit "Clarifies" Continuing Violation Doctrine

Skip to content

Trending ..... Bowman v. Monsanto: SCOTUS on Self-Replicating Technologies (eg Seeds) ..... Broker-Dealer Faces FCPA, Travel Act and Securities Fraud Charges for Venezuelan Payments ..... NLRB's Employee Rights Poster Comes Down ..... Ralph Lauren Settles FCPA Charges ..... Kiobel: SCOTUS Sends Alien Tort Statute Packing ..... DoJ Cuts Corporate Plea Agreement Carve-Out ..... The SEC's Netflix Report: Regulation FD and Social Media ..... Changes to DGCL Would Simplify Back-end Mergers ..... SCOTUS Decides Comcast v Behrend ..... Standard Fire: SCOTUS on CAFA Amount in Controversy Rules ..... Kallick: DE Board Enjoined from Opposing Rival Slate ..... Advisers Falling Short on Custody Rule ..... How Bad Will it Be? That is Sequestration ..... Gabelli v. SEC: SCOTUS on Limitations Period for Federal Enforcement Actions ..... HIPAA Omnibus Rule ..... Final FATCA Regs ..... PPACA: Play or Pay ..... DOJ/SEC Issue FCPA Guidance .....

Third Circuit "Clarifies" Continuing Violation Doctrine [Mandel v. M & Q Packaging Corp]

Proskauer
February 22, 2013
3 pages

Employee Litigation News

Buchanan Ingersoll Rooney: The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Dismisses a Religious Discrimination Claim Because the Plaintiff Shareholder-Director was Not an "Employee" Under Title VII

May 17, 2013 Employee Litigation

Skadden: Toll Manufacturing Transactions: Trade Secret and IP Protection

May 15, 2013 Trade Secrets

Jackson Lewis: Arbitration Agreement in Employee Handbook Enforceable, California Court of Appeal Rules [Serpa v. California Surety Investigations]

May 03, 2013 Human Resources-Litigation

Kasten v. Saint-Gobain: Oral Complaints Are Protected Activity Under The FLSA

Bass Berry Sims: Two Supreme Court Decisions Potentially Expand Employer Liability

Paul Hastings: United States Supreme Court Expands Retaliation Risks for Employers

Venable: Complaint or Not Complaint: That is the Question

Staub v Proctor Hospital: Supreme Court Expands "Cat's Paw" Liability in Employment Discrimination Case

Proskauer: The Take-Aways from the Supreme Court’s “Cat’s Paw” Decision

Pillsbury: Supreme Court Reinforces Obligation of Decision-Maker to Carefully Examine the Basis for Taking Employment Action

Akerman: Employers Beware of the "Cat's Paw:" Discriminatory Animus Within the Chain of Command

Collins v. Gee West Seattle: Ninth Circuit Holds WARN Act "Employment Losses" Include Pre-Closure Leavers

Seyfarth Shaw: Employees Who Quit In Anticipation Of Business Closure Count As “Employment Losses” Under The WARN Act

Morgan Lewis: Confusion Over “Voluntary” Departures When Evaluating WARN Notice Requirements: Employers Beware

Holland & Knight: Ninth Circuit Creates New Bright Line Rule: Employees Who Abandon Their Jobs Because of a Business Closing Have Not Voluntarily Departed per WARN

NASA v Nelson & Federal Background Checks

Baker Donelson: Two Recent Supreme Court Holdings Split The Difference For Employees/Employers

Mintz Levin: Privacy Implications of Employment Background Checks: U.S. Supreme Court Rules for Employers

Littler: U.S. Supreme Court Holds that Constitutional Privacy Rights Do Not Restrict the Government's Discretion to Background Check Federal Contractors

Thompson v. NA Stainless & 3rd Party Protection Under Title VII’s Anti-Retaliation Provisions

Latham & Watkins: Supreme Court Limits Reach of Non-Article III Courts’ Jurisdiction

Faegre & Benson: Supreme Court Decides J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro

Schulte Roth & Zabel: Supreme Court Expands Availability of Retaliation Claim to Parties “Connected” to an Employee Who Complains of Discrimination

Dukes v Wal-Mart: Certification of Title VII Discrimination Class Action

Paul Hastings: The Untolled Tale: American Pipe Tolling in the Wake of Dukes v. Wal-Mart

Littler: Dukes v. Wal-Mart: Some Closed Doors and Open Issues

Nixon Peabody: Dukes redux: plaintiffs seek certification of smaller class sizes in two states