Securities Law Alert, January 2013
Simpson Thacher
January 31, 2013
19 pages
In this Issue:
- The Second Circuit Holds That Section 16(b) Does Not Apply to an Insider’s Purchase and Sale of Different Types of Stock in the Same Company
- The Ninth Circuit Addresses the Standard for Pleading That Aftermarket Purchases Are Traceable to a Particular Offering for Purposes of a Section 11 Claim
- The Ninth Circuit Holds That SLUSA Does Not Preclude Class Actions Alleging Breach of a Variable Life Insurance Contract
- The Ninth Circuit Reinstates a Securities Fraud Class Action against VeriFone Based on a Holistic Evaluation of the Scienter Allegations
- The Middle District of Tennessee Dismisses a Securities Fraud Action against Biomimetic Therapeutics in an Opinion of Interest to Life Sciences Companies
- The Delaware Supreme Court Holds That a Large Stockholder Was Entitled to Opt Out of a Shareholder Class Action Settlement
- The First Department Dismisses a Securities-Related Common Law Fraud Action against Porsche on Forum Non Conveniens Grounds



![Bingham: Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Creates Split Among Circuits for Pleading False Statements of Opinion or Belief for Section 11 Claims [Indiana State Dist. Council of Laborers & HOD Carriers Pension & Welfare Fund v. Omnicare, Inc]](/modules/mod_raxo_allmode/tools/tb.php?src=/images/stories/BinghamLogo.gif&w=120&h=72&zc=1)













![Mayer Brown: The Edge Act Confers Federal Jurisdiction According to US District Court for the Southern District of New York [Dexia SA/NV v. Bear Stearns]](/modules/mod_raxo_allmode/tools/tb.php?src=/images/stories/MayerBrownLogo.gif&w=120&h=72&zc=1)
![Baker Hostetler: Third Circuit Holds Rule 10b-5 Violations May Be Imputed to Investment Management Company on Basis of Apparent Agency [Belmont v. MB Investment Partners, Inc]](/modules/mod_raxo_allmode/tools/tb.php?src=/images/stories/BakerHostetlerLogo.gif&w=120&h=72&zc=1)






