Goodwin Procter
January 8, 2013
4 pages
In this Issue:
- Federal District Court Allows Mutual Fund Shareholders to Proceed with Section 36(b) Claims Asserting That Investment Adviser’s Fees are Excessive Because the Funds’ Sub-Advisers Allegedly Perform Most of the Funds’ Investment Management Services
- OCC Provides Guidance on Transition Period for Compliance with the Swaps Push-Out Rule
- FinCEN Extends FBAR Filing Deadline Until June 30, 2014 for Certain Individuals With Signature or Other Authority Only Over Certain Foreign Financial Accounts
- CFTC Issues Additional No-Action Relief From Swap Dealer De Minimis Calculations for U.S. Banks Wholly Owned by Foreign Entities
Financial Services Newsletter
















![Dentons: United Kingdom Supreme Court Rules on Setting Aside Trustee Decisions [Futter v. HMRC and Pitt v. HMRC]](/modules/mod_raxo_allmode/tools/tb.php?src=/images/stories/DentonsLogo.gif&w=120&h=72&zc=1)



















![Skadden: New York’s Highest Court Refuses to Allow Judgment Enforcement Against International Bank Subsidiaries [Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands v. CIBC]](/modules/mod_raxo_allmode/tools/tb.php?src=/images/stories/SkaddenLogo.gif&w=120&h=72&zc=1)








