myCorporateResource.com

Skip to content

You are here: Key States

Human Resources Litigation

Crowell & Moring: California Appellate Court Approves (Finally) of Neutral Time Rounding

Skip to content

Trending ..... Myriad: SCOTUS Rules on Gene Patentability ..... Oxford Health Plans: SCOTUS Backs Arbitrator on Class Call ..... Bowman v. Monsanto: SCOTUS on Self-Replicating Technologies (eg Seeds) ..... SEC Proposes Money Market Reforms ..... Wellness Program Guidance ..... Equator Principles ..... Broker-Dealer Faces FCPA, Travel Act and Securities Fraud Charges for Venezuelan Payments ..... NLRB's Employee Rights Poster Comes Down ..... Ralph Lauren Settles FCPA Charges ..... Kiobel: SCOTUS Sends Alien Tort Statute Packing ..... DoJ Cuts Corporate Plea Agreement Carve-Out ..... How Bad Will it Be? That is Sequestration ..... HIPAA Omnibus Rule ..... Final FATCA Regs ..... PPACA: Play or Pay ..... DOJ/SEC Issue FCPA Guidance .....

California Appellate Court Approves (Finally) of Neutral Time Rounding [See's Candy Shops]

Crowell & Moring
November 7, 2012
3 pages

California HR-Related Litigation

Jackson Lewis: L.A. County Must Provide Non-Union Employees’ Home Addresses, Phone Numbers to Union, California Supreme Court Rules

June 05, 2013 Human Resources-Litigation

Jackson Lewis: Waiver of Vacation Pay on Termination in Collective Agreements Must be Clear and Unmistakable, California Court Rules

June 05, 2013 Human Resources-Litigation

DLA Piper: California Court of Appeal: rest periods must be separately compensated for employees paid on a piece rate [Bluford v. Safeway Stores Inc]

June 01, 2013 Human Resources-Litigation

Sonic Calabasas: Arbitration Agreements do Not Preempt Administrative Wage Claim Procedures

Seyfarth Shaw: United States Supreme Court Vacates California Supreme Court Ruling On Arbitration Agreements

Goodwin Procter: California Supreme Court Declines to Hear Prevailing Wage Case

Seyfarth Shaw: California Supreme Court Holds That Mandatory Employment Arbitration Agreements Do Not Preempt Labor Commissioner Claims

Reid v. Google: "Stray Remarks Doctrine" Curtailed

Drinker Biddle: "Is the Stray Remarks Doctrine Now 'Too Old To Matter?"

ReedSmith: Reid v. Google, Inc.: California Supreme Court Rejects 'Stray Remarks Doctrine'

Cooley: Stray Remarks May Be Considered Evidence of Discrimination in California [Reid v. Google, Inc.]

Martinez v. Combs expands “Employer” Definition For Purposes of Unpaid Wages

Davis Wright Tremaine: Martinez v. Combs: California Supreme Court Broadly Defines “Employer” For Purposes of Unpaid Wages

Venable: Third Parties Beware: California Supreme Court Ruling Expands "Employer" Definition [Martinez v. Combs]

Jackson Lewis: California Supreme Court Adopts Broad Definition of "Employer" for Overtime and Minimum Wage Actions [Martinez v. Combs]

Arechiga v. Dolores Press: California Appellate Court Approves Explicit Mutual Wage Agreements

Bingham: Salaried Non-Exempt: Not an Oxymoron Under California Law

Jackson Lewis: California Court Rules Employer Not Required to Pay Overtime under Explicit Mutual Wage Agreement [Arechiga v. Dolores Press, Inc.]

Seyfarth Shaw: A Recent California Decision On Overtime May Cause More Problems Than It Solves [Arechiga v. Dolores Press, Inc.]

Starbucks and the Pooling of Employee Tips

California Court of Appeal Reverses in StarbucksTipping Lawsuit

Seyfarth Shaw: Fourth District Court of Appeal Reverses $86 Million Starbucks Tip-Pooling Award

Proskauer Rose: California Court of Appeal Reverses $105m Judgment In Starbucks Case and Clarifies Permissible Tip-Allocation Practices

Brescia & the Identification of Trade Secrets

Littler: Brescia v. Angelin, the Latest Reported Case Regarding CCP 2019.210 Trade Secret Statements: A More Employer-Friendly Standard

Nixon Peabody: California's statutory "Trade Secret Identification" pre-condition to discovery requires serious consideration before commencing suit for trade secret misappropriation

Mintz Levin: Court of Appeals Ruling Potentially Streamlines Trade Secret Litigation

Brinker & Meal Periods

Crowell & Moring: Brinker Warrants Certification of Meal and Rest Break Class Claims in Two Recent California Decisions

Holland & Knight: Significant California Supreme Court Decision in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court Concerning Meal and Rest Periods

McGuireWoods: Give Me a Break! CA Supreme Court Issues Long-Awaited Brinker Decision on Meal and Rest Breaks

Sullivan v Oracle: Reach of California Labor Code

Lowenstein Sandler: California Employers Must Comply with California Overtime Laws for Out-of-State Employees Working in California

Bingham: Sullivan v. Oracle Update: Non-Residents Entitled to Overtime Pay Under California Law

Bryan Cave: California Supreme Court Applies State Law Overtime Rules To Nonresident Employees

Hernandez v Hillsides: Guidance on Workplace Surveillance

Troutman Sanders: Watch Your Own Back, Not Just Your Employees’ [Hernandez v. Hillsides, Inc.]

Mayer Brown: California Supreme Court Issues Guidance On Workplace Video Surveillance [Hernandez, et al. v. Hillsides, Inc.]

Alston + Bird: Hernandez V. Hillsides: Evolving Calif. Privacy Law

Pearson Dental Supplies & Judicial Review of Employment Arbitration Awards

DLA Piper: How will Pearson Dental affect judicial review of arbitral awards in employment cases?

Gibson Dunn: The California Supreme Court Opens the Door for Increased Judicial Review of Employment Arbitration Awards [Pearson Dental Supplies, Inc. v. Sup. Ct (Turcios)]

Venable: California Supreme Court Ruling Has Bite for Employment Arbitration Awards [Pearson Dental Supplies, Inc. v. Superior Court]

Edwards v Arthur Anderson: Non-Competes in California

Venable: Enforcing Non-Compete Provisions in California

Morrison & Foerster: Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLP: One Year Later

DLA Piper: California tightens already tough restrictions on noncompetes [Edwards v. Arthur Andersen]

Schachter v Citigroup: Court Upholds Terms of Voluntary Equity Plan

Cooley Godward Kronish: New California Supreme Court Decision Schachter v. Citigroup Upholds Forfeiture Provision in Key Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Littler: The Contractual Basis of Incentive Compensation Re-Emphasized: Restricted Stock in Lieu of Cash Wages Can Be Forfeited By Resignation in California [Schachter v. Citigroup, Inc]

Paul Hastings: California Supreme Court Upholds Forfeiture of Incentive Compensation